US and UK Resistance Forces Urge Banks to Reconsider Crypto Regulations

US and UK Resistance Forces Urge Banks to Reconsider Crypto Regulations

Global financial regulators are facing a significant challenge as the stringent rules initially established for cryptocurrencies, spearheaded by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, are encountering resistance from major economies. This resistance, primarily emanating from the United States and the United Kingdom, threatens to fundamentally alter the ongoing discussions surrounding crypto risk management and potentially unravel a long-standing consensus. The situation underscores a rapidly evolving landscape within the global financial system, demanding a recalibration of existing frameworks to accommodate the burgeoning adoption of digital assets.

The core of the issue stems from the Basel Committee’s initial implementation of a 1,250% risk weighting for crypto exposures. This demanding requirement compels credit institutions to hold assets equal in value to the amount of their crypto-asset investments, a stipulation designed to mitigate the perceived risks associated with digital assets. White & Case, a leading global law firm, highlights this substantial capital charge, emphasizing its potential impact on banks’ willingness to engage with the crypto market. The framework originally targeted permissionless blockchains, encompassing prominent stablecoins like USDt and USDC, applying the same rigorous risk weighting as the riskiest venture capital investments, a degree of scrutiny seen as disproportionately severe by many market participants.

However, the swift and substantial growth of regulated stablecoins has dramatically shifted the policy landscape. Governor Erik Thedéen of the Swedish central bank and chair of the Basel Committee acknowledged this transformation, stating, “What has happened has been fairly dramatic.” He indicated a pressing need for a fresh analysis, suggesting a potentially more accommodating approach to stablecoin risks. The increased adoption of these assets, driven in part by support from US President Donald Trump’s administration and the passage of the GENIUS Act, which formally authorized the use of stablecoins in payments, has necessitated a reassessment of the initial framework. The debate centers on the appropriate risk profile of stablecoins and the role of bank-issued digital assets within the broader financial system.

The resistance from key economies is becoming increasingly explicit. The US Federal Reserve has stated its intention not to implement the Basel crypto rules as originally conceived, citing concerns about the capital charges’ unrealistic demands. Similarly, the Bank of England has signaled its unwillingness to apply the framework in its current form. The European Union has taken a more measured approach, partially implementing the 2022 standards while excluding key provisions concerning permissionless blockchains. This divergence in policy creation creates a considerable competitive imbalance. If European banks remain bound by the stringent regulatory requirements while the US and the UK adopt more flexible frameworks, the advantages for building bank-issued stablecoin products, tokenized deposits, or crypto custody solutions will primarily rest within those more lenient jurisdictions. This imbalance could significantly impact where innovative crypto-related services are developed and deployed internationally.

The potential for a “stablecoin panic” to disrupt the European Central Bank’s (ECB) policy decisions is also being discussed, as warned by the Dutch central bank governor. The widening gap in regulatory approaches underscores the challenges facing global banks seeking to operate in the evolving crypto market. The Basel Committee itself is reportedly preparing to revise its 2022 guidance, aiming for a more favorable stance for banks participating in the crypto market. However, achieving consensus within the committee remains a significant hurdle due to the diverse range of viewpoints regarding crypto risk profiles and the role banks should play in issuing digital assets. Navigating these complex and rapidly changing dynamics will be crucial for ensuring a stable and competitive global financial system that can effectively incorporate the opportunities presented by digital assets.

THIS CONTENT IS CURRENTLY LOCKED.

LucyAI is scheduled to launch in 2026.

Contact the organization’s assistant to receive early access and related benefits in advance, including AI-powered stock picks, signals, and expert-backed research as features roll out.